What kind of conclusions should be avoided in forensic reports if lacking documentation?

In forensic reporting, it is crucial to maintain a high level of objectivity and reliability. When there is a lack of documentation to support conclusions, opinion-based analysis should be avoided. This is because opinion-based analysis can be subjective and may lead to conclusions that are not grounded in verifiable evidence or demonstrable fact.

A forensic report is intended to provide clear and factual information, based on objective data collected during an investigation. Clear factual statements, evidence assessments, and technical summaries are generally grounded in documented findings and empirical data. These elements contribute to the overall integrity and credibility of the forensic process. In contrast, conclusions that arise from personal beliefs or interpretations, rather than established and documented evidence, can compromise the report's validity and potentially influence legal outcomes negatively. Therefore, it is essential to ensure that all conclusions presented in forensic reports are well-supported by accurate documentation to uphold the standards of the profession.