What type of interpretation should a computer forensic report contain?

A computer forensic report should contain factual interpretations. This is crucial because the primary purpose of such a report is to present the evidence collected during a forensic investigation in a clear, accurate, and objective manner. Factual interpretations rely on verifiable data and are directly supported by the findings of the investigation. This ensures that the reports can withstand scrutiny in legal contexts where precision and clarity are essential.

While the other options may seem relevant, they do not fully encapsulate the necessary approach for a forensic report. For instance, notions like trivial could imply information that is not significant or relevant, which would undermine the integrity of the report. Similarly, while unbiased is an important principle, it doesn't specifically address the emphasis on factual accuracy necessary for forensic conclusions. Natural interpretations also do not align well with the objectives of forensic analysis, which prioritizes definitive facts over subjective interpretation. Thus, focusing on factual reporting maintains the credibility and reliability of the forensic process.