Which of the following describes evidence that supports or validates a particular hypothesis?

Prepare for the Certified Digital Forensics Examiner Test. Study with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each question offering hints and explanations. Get ready for your exam!

Inculpatory evidence refers to any information or material that can establish an individual's involvement in a crime or support a particular hypothesis regarding their guilt. This type of evidence is crucial in a legal context as it serves to strengthen the prosecution's case by demonstrating that a defendant likely had a role in the criminal activity being investigated. For example, evidence that places a suspect at the scene of a crime or connects them to the actions taken will enhance the case against them.

In contrast, exculpatory evidence would serve to absolve a defendant, showing their innocence or providing an alternative explanation that undermines the prosecution's claims. Evidence of tampering indicates that data or evidence has been altered or interfered with, which casts doubt on its reliability, rather than supporting a hypothesis. Material evidence is a broader term that involves evidence relevant to a case, but it may not necessarily validate a specific hypothesis directly. Thus, inculpatory evidence is specifically focused on supporting claims of involvement or guilt, making it the correct answer in this context.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy